ISPs Must Ask Before Collecting Personal Data
Internet service providers such as cable companies will no longer be allowed to use or sell personal data about customers without permission. The ban includes details about the sites and apps that a customer uses.
It's part of a new set of rules issued by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) after a 3-2 vote in favor by commissioners. The rules will be formally published soon, at which point ISPs will have a year to comply, though smaller providers will have a further 12 months after that.
Providers will have to tell customers what data they collect, how they use it, and who if anyone they pass it on to. There's also a new "opt-in" category of particularly sensitive information which providers can't collect or pass on unless customers actively give permission for them to do so.
Finance And Health Data Protected
This opt-in category includes a customer's precise location; information about children, health, finance or social security numbers; details of the sites or apps a customer uses; and the content of any online communication such as emails. (Source: fcc.gov)
Providers can't force customers to give permission by threatening to not accept their business unless they do. However, they could put clauses in their terms and conditions that say the customer gives permission, leaving it up to the customer to read the fine print and ask for such clauses to be removed. (Source: computerworld.com)
Most other data will fall into an opt-out category which means providers can use and share the data unless the customers tells them not to. There's also a limited category of data which companies can always collect and use such as keeping a record of a customer's contact details to send them bills or market relevant services.
Website Owners Unaffected
The rules don't affect companies that run websites and other online services such as search engines or social media. That's because the FCC only governs Internet service providers, with content providers instead being an issue for the Federal Trade Commission.
Other rules taking effect mean Internet service providers must develop and maintain policies to protect the data they collect against hacking and other breaches. If a breach happens, they'll have a maximum of 30 days to tell customers. If a breach affects at least 5,000 customers, the provider must tell the FCC, the FBI and the Secret Service within seven days.
What's Your Opinion?
Do the rules go far enough? Did the FCC pick the right types of data for the "opt-in" category? Will the rules make much difference considering they don't affect the likes of Facebook and Google?
Most popular articles
- Which Processor is Better: Intel or AMD? - Explained
- How to Prevent Ransomware in 2018 - 10 Steps
- 5 Best Anti Ransomware Software Free
- How to Fix: Computer / Network Infected with Ransomware (10 Steps)
- How to Fix: Your Computer is Infected, Call This Number (Scam)
- Scammed by Informatico Experts? Here's What to Do
- Scammed by Smart PC Experts? Here's What to Do
- Scammed by Right PC Experts? Here's What to Do
- Scammed by PC / Web Network Experts? Here's What to Do
- How to Fix: Windows Update Won't Update
- Explained: Do I need a VPN? Are VPNs Safe for Online Banking?
- Explained: VPN vs Proxy; What's the Difference?
- Explained: Difference Between VPN Server and VPN (Service)
- Forgot Password? How to: Reset Any Password: Windows Vista, 7, 8, 10
- How to: Use a Firewall to Block Full Screen Ads on Android
- Explained: Absolute Best way to Limit Data on Android
- Explained: Difference Between Dark Web, Deep Net, Darknet and More
- Explained: If I Reset Windows 10 will it Remove Malware?
My name is Dennis Faas and I am a senior systems administrator and IT technical analyst specializing in cyber crimes (sextortion / blackmail / tech support scams) with over 30 years experience; I also run this website! If you need technical assistance , I can help. Click here to email me now; optionally, you can review my resume here. You can also read how I can fix your computer over the Internet (also includes user reviews).
We are BBB Accredited
We are BBB accredited (A+ rating), celebrating 21 years of excellence! Click to view our rating on the BBB.
Comments
How effective with this be?
I'm not sure how effective this will be. Google (and other websites) already track users - and they do it very well. Plus, they have a massive tracking network that spans almost the entire Internet, which would make it very difficult to not be tracked.
On the other hand, ISPs help 'fill in the gap' for those who surf anonymously because they can track IP addresses even if users clear their cookies, plus they have gender and age information readily available which can be shared.
With all the info, they then pass it on to other marketing companies, which then (I believe) gets fed back to Google and/or Double Click for the purpose of serving up relevant ads. Based on that, I'm not sure how effective this ISP 'ban on sharing personal data' will be, given that other websites will remain unaffected in their massive IP tracking.
Lastly, I am not sure how the consumer would be able to prove that their ISP is or is not in fact tracking them. It would be virtually impossible, given what I already mentioned.
This looks like something to
This looks like something to placate the watchdogs. Really, there's nothing to this ruling. It still allows passing on personally identifying information. That's what needs to stop, otherwise, a computer probably connects the dots before a webpage finishes loading. Major players have 12 months to comply, and small ISPs have even more time? What is so hard about "stop collecting information"?
And I believe you're right on target with trying to prove non-compliance. The only way to prove something like that is to be on the inside and claim whistle-blower status. I can think of half a dozen places I'd like to work...small local businesses...to put a stop to violations of their own policies(contract with customer) and laws. I know of a contractor using the drivers license database info for their business, not in the performance of state business. Gotta be somewhere inside to prove it.